What are the three criteria established by the Castaneda v. Pickard decision for evaluating bilingual education programs?

The three criteria established by the Castaneda v. Pickard decision for evaluating bilingual education programs are indeed Theory, Implementation, and Effectiveness. This landmark case established a framework for assessing the quality of educational programs for English Language Learners (ELLs).

The criteria indicate that any program designed to support ELLs should be grounded in a solid theoretical framework that recognizes the needs of these students. Furthermore, effective implementation is crucial, meaning that the program must be carried out as intended, with qualified personnel and adequate resources. Lastly, effectiveness refers to the outcomes of the program, which should demonstrate that students are achieving academic success and gaining proficiency in English.

The other options do not align with the criteria established by this significant court decision. While elements like teacher training and parental involvement are important aspects of effective educational programming, they do not encompass the complete framework required for evaluation in the context of the Castaneda decision. Similarly, aspects such as curriculum design and community support, or student demographics and funding sources, represent important considerations in educational settings but do not form the primary evaluative standards set forth in this ruling.